[core-workflow] Final chance to express opinion on history rewrite for issue #s

[M.-A. Lemburg]

On 09.02.2017 18:42, Zachary Ware wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
>> +1: Nick, Senthil, Chris
>> +0: ...
>> -0: Martin, Brett
>> -1: Naoki, Berker
> 
> Since we don't get clickable links any way about it, -1 on rewriting
> commit messages.  Too easy to accidentally mess things up for no real
> benefit.

Agreed. -1 as well. Github may support configuring link REs at
some point, so we may then configure things to suit our needs
as necessary in the future. Without working links, the rewrite
isn't all that useful.

-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
eGenix.com

Professional Python Services directly from the Experts (#1, Feb 09 2017)
>>> Python Projects, Coaching and Consulting ...  http://www.egenix.com/
>>> Python Database Interfaces ...           http://products.egenix.com/
>>> Plone/Zope Database Interfaces ...           http://zope.egenix.com/
________________________________________________________________________

::: We implement business ideas - efficiently in both time and costs :::

   eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH  Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
    D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
           Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
               http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/
                      http://www.malemburg.com/