[C++-SIG] Restarting

[David Beazley]

> 
> Peronally, I see this as a very sensible, extremely portable,
> deployment plan.  What do David and others think?
> 

I think the proposed configuration plan and optional nature of this
addition sound fine.  Since I am still a bit of a C++ skeptic, I am
somewhat wary of C++ portability claims despite the existence of a
"standard."  However, I agree with you that this could be a non-issue
in a few years (at least one would hope :-).

Cheers,

Dave