[C++-sig] Possible overload<> template for class members

[David Abrahams]

"Joel de Guzman" <djowel at gmx.co.uk> writes:

> Why not simply:
>
>    .def("show", overload<>(&Window::show))
>    .def("show", overload<int>(&Window::show))
>    .def("show", overload<int,bool*>(&Window::show))
>    .def("show", overload<int,bool>(&Window::show))
>
> Can't we do that?

Look back a few messages in this thread.  Wasn't that precisely what I
was suggesting at the end of
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.c%2B%2B/2083
?

I believe Aleksey's objections apply here.

-- 
                       David Abrahams
   dave at boost-consulting.com * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution