[C++-sig] Re: Re: Compile failure with object in V2
david.abrahams at rcn.com
Sun Jul 14 23:04:30 CEST 2002
From: "Dave Hawkes" <daveh at cadlink.com>
> "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams at rcn.com> wrote in message
> news:1dec01c22b5c$3a077cb0$6601a8c0 at boostconsulting.com...
> > From: "Dave Hawkes" <daveh at cadlink.com>
> > OK, I'll need your SourceForge username.
OK, you're all set.
Remember that you won't be able to check things in from any CVS tree you've
got checked out as anonymous.
> > It's important to have docs for whatever you check in. What's your
> > with respect to documentation of these components?
> For some of the work like the pre-created main module I will need to
> your existing docs. The API interface will require new docs. I have not
> much further than reviewing the current V2 docs in CVS and thinking about
> approach. I have got some test code from which I can cull sample code.
> I assume the templates you have in place for much of the V2 docs. in CVS
> in the style that will accompany the release?
Yep. There's also going to be a more narrative tutorial section, but the
reference docs are the hard ones.
More information about the Cplusplus-sig