[C++-sig] Re: Re: sub module support in V2

[Dave Hawkes]

> Just who are you arguing with here?

I thought I'd start a new trend and start flaming myself...

> BTW, I am not happy about the interface in which sub() chaining introduces
> another level of nesting. I would prefer it if you could find a way to get
> something like this to work:
>
> module("outer")
>     .add(
>         module("inner1")
>             .def(...)
>             ...
>         )
>     .add(
>         module("inner2")
>             .def(...)
>             ...
>     )
>
> I realize this is a bit problematic, especially since class_<> instances
> now get their __module__ attribute from the module they are added to. I'm
> just asking you to think about it.
>

Also how do the inner modules get their parent when they are instantiated at
this point? I'll certainly think about it as rough out a first
implementation.

Dave Hawkes