[C++-sig] Re: Pyste: support for user defined code.
Prabhu Ramachandran
prabhu at aero.iitm.ernet.in
Sun Aug 17 05:36:09 CEST 2003
>>>>> "N" == nicodemus <nicodemus at globalite.com.br> writes:
N> Hmm, agreed, those "add" are redundant anyway, and I like
N> "code" better than "include". 8)
N> The names in caps indicates the sections in the source file
N> where the code should go:
Rather than using the special all caps MODULE etc. why not just do
this:
add_header(...)
add_declaration(...)
add_module(...)
or
code_header(...)
...
or
header_code()
declaration_code()
module_code()
I'd prefer any of these to code(MODULE, <code>) etc. since it looks
much cleaner.
Thanks!
cheers,
prabhu
More information about the Cplusplus-sig
mailing list