[C++-sig] Re: Pyste: support for user defined code.

[David Abrahams]

Nicodemus <nicodemus at globalite.com.br> writes:

> Prabhu Ramachandran wrote:
>
>>>>>>>"N" == nicodemus  <nicodemus at globalite.com.br> writes:
>>>>>>>            
>>
>>    N> Hmm, agreed, those "add" are redundant anyway, and I like
>>    N> "code" better than "include". 8)
>>
>>    N> The names in caps indicates the sections in the source file
>>    N> where the code should go:
>>
>>Rather than using the special all caps MODULE etc. why not just do
>>this:
>>
>> add_header(...)
>> add_declaration(...)
>> add_module(...)
>>
>> or code_header(...)
>> ...
>>
>>or
>>
>> header_code()
>> declaration_code()
>> module_code()
>>
>>I'd prefer any of these to code(MODULE, <code>) etc. since it looks
>>much cleaner.
>>  
>
> Agreed. There's not enough cases to justify the use of constants. I think:
>
> header_code()

  include('foo.hpp')

> declaration_code()
> global_declaration_code()

  These two names are not very distinct.  What's the difference?

> module_code()

  hello.inject('''
        // my C++ code here
  ''')

  
  hello.World.inject('''
        // my C++ code here
  ''')


-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com