[C++-sig] Re: Interest in luabind
grafik666 at redshift-software.com
Fri Jul 4 03:06:42 CEST 2003
[2003-07-04] Joel de Guzman wrote:
>Nicodemus <nicodemus at globalite.com.br> wrote:
>> Rene Rivera wrote:
>>> Script has "limiting" connotations in my mind. After all
>>> what happens when we add bindings for other
>>> non-scripting languages like: Lisp/CLOS, Smalltalk,
>>> Haskell, etc. And for non-language related bindings like
>>> CORBA, COM, SOAP, XMLRPC, etc.
>>> Boost.Language is a thought, but too broad. Boost.Bind
>>> is taken. ;-) Boost.Interface might work. Boost.Objects
>>> perhaps? Or Boost.ObjectBind?
>> Perhaps Boost.Export? After all, it is all about
>> exporting C++ code to other languages... just a thought.
>Boost.Export is a good name.
Yes, good suggestion indeed :-)
-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera (at) acm.org - grafik (at) redshift-software.com
-- 102708583 (at) icq
More information about the Cplusplus-sig