[C++-sig] Re: Interest in luabind
dave at boost-consulting.com
Fri Jul 4 04:50:14 CEST 2003
Rene Rivera <grafik666 at redshift-software.com> writes:
> I thought that for such a restructuring you would not want to mess with the
> current BP, even if on a branch?
That's what branches are for!
> But I can see that it would be easier than copying over a bunch of
> BP code.
> Any ideas/preferences on: Where do we discuss the refactoring of the
> common code and the laubind dev? It seems like noise polution to
> keep it on this list. Daniel do you have a non-user list set up for
> LuaBind? Or we can add a list to the SF boost project.
I prefer here, but only a little. Those interested in Boost.Python
internals (I'm thinking of people like Brett Calcott and Dirk Gerrits
here) would have to subscribe to whatever other forum we pick.
More information about the Cplusplus-sig