[C++-sig] Re: plans for a bugfix release ?
dominique.devriese at student.kuleuven.ac.be
Tue Jul 15 20:58:05 CEST 2003
David Abrahams writes:
> Dominique Devriese <dominique.devriese at student.kuleuven.ac.be>
>>> In general, they are released when all of Boost is ready. I think
>>> it would be a *really* good idea for Boost to do at least one
>>> minor version release shortly after any major version release.
>>> Now that we have a reasonable testing strategy it should be
>>> relatively easy. Boost 1.30.0 went out with several bugs IIRC.
>>> Until we get our act together, I would suggest you supply people
>>> with a Boost patch. Use "BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME" instead of
>>> "typename" so you don't break VC6. Sorry,
>> A fixed release would be great indeed. In the mean time, I'm going
>> to provide the patch as you suggest, although it's far from a
>> perfect solution of course..
> What does everybody think about doing a 1.30.1 release "RSN?"
> I don't think there's much to it, unless people have been checking
> things into the 1.30 branch unintentionally.
If I might ask another thing:
Would it be possible to include this patch too in the new release ?
More information about the Cplusplus-sig