[C++-sig] Re: Pyste suggestion: handling void * arguments

[David Abrahams]

"Niall Douglas" <s_sourceforge at nedprod.com> writes:

>> >If however you choose the casting route (which is technically 
>> >undefined behaviour, but I can't see many modern systems 
>> >differentiating between types of pointers) I can send you my altered
>> >pyste. Remember that virtual method overrides in wrapper classes will
>> > have to cast anyway no matter what.
>> 
>> I don't know, "undefined behaviour" is never good. Dave, what's your
>> opinion on this?
>
> It's no more undefined than the is_polymorphic trick in type_traits.

There is absolutely no undefined behavior in is_polymorphic

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com