[C++-sig] Re: Big slow compilation
David Abrahams
dave at boost-consulting.com
Sun Nov 2 01:17:43 CET 2003
"Niall Douglas" <s_sourceforge at nedprod.com> writes:
> That's the price of heavy template usage. Mine takes over an hour
> with a dual-processor 1700 machine with MSVC and more like six hours
> with GCC 3.2 uniprocessor.
>
> To my knowledge, your only solution is the usual - GCC v3.4 (when the
> precompiled headers are fixed), faster machine, distcc and also
> consider applying that patch removing symbol folding which takes
> O(N^2) on GCC. Search the list archives. Lastly, also consider a
> faster compiler eg; Borland, Intel C++ etc.
Borland doesn't work with Boost.Python and Intel C++ is slower than
GCC last time I checked.
Better suggestions for speed are Metrowerks or MSVC.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
More information about the Cplusplus-sig
mailing list