[C++-sig] Re: function::argument_error / overloads & docstrings

Nikolay Mladenov nickm at sitius.com
Thu Nov 6 23:34:13 CET 2003

David Abrahams wrote:

> > So why having the option to stick signature in the docstring is bad? It
> > is only an option.
> I didn't say it was; you were looking for something less intrusive.

I see, but until we find it I like that one.

> > Combining the overloads docstrings shouldn't be a problem as well
> > since one can supply a single docstring per name.
> Fine with me.

Can I implement this?

Nikolay Mladenov
Sitius Automaion Inc.

More information about the Cplusplus-sig mailing list