[C++-sig] Re: [Implementation] Calling wrapped functions, converters, policies
dave at boost-consulting.com
Fri Sep 19 16:59:43 CEST 2003
Prabhu Ramachandran <prabhu at aero.iitm.ernet.in> writes:
>>>>>> "RWGK" == Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve <rwgk at yahoo.com> writes:
> RWGK> --- David Abrahams <dave at boost-consulting.com> wrote:
> >> What's the difference between custom-written interface files
> >> and custom-written Pyste scripts?
> RWGK> Can you have if statements, loops and subroutines in SWIG
> RWGK> interface files, or importable modules that concentrate
> RWGK> frequently used functionality? Also, how do the C++ parsers
> RWGK> in g++ and SWIG compare?
> AFAIK with SWIG, if's are possible, loops are not. You can define
> quite powerful macros and you could call them 'subroutines'. The SWIG
> C++ parser is not perfect but works with most C++. It is however
> *really* fast compared to g++/GCC_XML, I'd say about 10x faster.
I wonder how the parser used in Synopsis (synopsis.sf.net) compares
More information about the Cplusplus-sig