[C++-sig] Pyste bug: can't set different return policies on method
Nicodemus
nicodemus at globalite.com.br
Sun Sep 21 19:32:52 CEST 2003
Niall Douglas wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>In a class like as follows:
>
>class FXFile
>{
> const FXString &name() const;
> static FXString name(const FXString &file);
>};
>
>Pyste gets the two name()'s confused and tries to apply
>return_internal_reference to both. If I try to override and set one
>of the name()'s to something different, the pyste syntax doesn't let
>me.
>
>Solutions? I figured I can temporarily
>return_value_policy(manage_new_object)) but in other situations this
>wouldn't be possible.
>
That's a limitation of Pyste right now. One of the future plans is to
allow metaprogramming inside the pyste files, which would allow you to
do something like this:
FXFile = Class(...)
if not FXFile.name.static:
set_policy(FXFile.name, return_internal_reference)
But this might take a while to be implemented... I haven't had much time
to work on Pyste lately. But what you think of this solution?
Regards,
Nicodemus.
More information about the Cplusplus-sig
mailing list