[C++-sig] Re: pyste and C++ namespaces]
Jeff Holle
jeff.holle at verizon.net
Tue Jan 27 20:58:02 CET 2004
I realize presently that I am mistaken about this.
In experimenting with a simple example, namespaces are handle elegantly.
So the generated wrapper class is caused by other things in "real" code,
which I will endeavor to avoid.
In further pyste experimenting, I put my C++ code in a namespace.
First surprise was that I needed to decorate my class name in the
*.pyste file with its housed namespace.
Doing this allowed pyste to run successfully, but.
Second surprise that the generated python interface class now contains a
"wrapper" class. Is this necessary? The class is easily accessible by
opening the namespace, or not, depending on the C++ choice.
More information about the Cplusplus-sig
mailing list