[C++-sig] Re: implicitly_convertible and char*
dave at boost-consulting.com
Sat Jul 3 20:19:27 CEST 2004
Dusty Leary <dleary at gmail.com> writes:
> so, any news on this?
What news grould there be? char const* and const char* are the same
thing, so trying it won't make any difference.
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:49:39 -0400, David Abrahams
> <dave at boost-consulting.com> wrote:
>> "Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <rwgk at yahoo.com> writes:
>> > I don't really feel competent in this matter, but I believe char const* and
>> > const char* are two different things. Did you try it with "const char*"?
>> They are the same thing.
More information about the Cplusplus-sig