[C++-sig] Re: Boost.Python in SUSE 9.0 or SUSE 9.1?
Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
rwgk at yahoo.com
Thu Jul 8 06:17:34 CEST 2004
--- Chris Hoeppler <hoeppler at diener.iap.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> Thanks for the help. I applied your workaround using BOOST_WORKAROUND as
> suggested by Ralf (see enclosed patch how) and successfully ran all the
> test in libs/python/test by invoking bjam with no arguments in that
> directory on the following two systems:
> * SuSE Linux 9.1 with gcc 3.3.3 as shipped by SuSE
> * SuSE Linux 9.0 with gcc 3.3.1 as shipped by SuSE
> On both systems I used boost_1_31_0 from the boost web-site.
> Could somebody with easy access to the official versions of gcc please
> test the enclosed patch, as well?
> Are there any other tests I could/should run?
Thanks for the patch! I've applied it locally and I've tested with gcc 3.3.1
and gcc 3.3.3 under Red Hat 9.0 without finding any difficulties. I've also
tested on a bunch of other platforms. Could you please do a last verification
to make sure my version works for you? Please get this file:
Unpack and run bjam as before. If you can confirm that it works as expected
under SuSE 9.x I'll check the patch into the main version.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
More information about the Cplusplus-sig