[C++-sig] Re: implicitly_convertible and char*
dave at boost-consulting.com
Fri Jul 9 14:38:35 CEST 2004
Dusty Leary <dleary at gmail.com> writes:
> I guess I'm being a pain, but I still have my same problem.
> To recap:
> I write saying that implicitly_convertible<X, char*> doesn't work.
> Dave responds saying that char* is not a valid C++ string, that char
> const * should work.
> I amend my example to show that char const * does not work.
> Thread gets a little sidetracked with "const char*" vs "char const *"
Sorry, I just don't think I have time to look into the problem right
More information about the Cplusplus-sig