[C++-sig] Re: make_constructor issues
dave at boost-consulting.com
Sat Jul 24 16:32:28 CEST 2004
Stefan Seefeld <sseefeld at art.ca> writes:
>> To me it seems the best implementation of the factory should return
>> auto_ptr<Foo> or shared_ptr<Foo> in order to avoid a copy.
> But copy-construct it must anyways, simply because I chose to export
> the type as class_<Foo>, not class_<Foo, shared_ptr<Foo> > !?!
No; there's no copy construction.
More information about the Cplusplus-sig