Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
rwgk at yahoo.com
Wed Jul 20 20:30:17 CEST 2005
--- Mike Rovner <mrovner at propel.com> wrote:
> Python has no nothion of multiple callable signatures (and method
> resolution) so I regard it unpythonic.
Very often I wish Python would support overloads. The alternative *args,
**keyword_args approach is unreadable. It forces you to look at __doc__. In my
mind that's a sign of a poor design. One of the main advantages of modern
languages is that they formalize what you used to find in comments in older
Input -> const, Output -> members of struct, IERR -> exception, etc. Of course,
Python is a long way from this stone-age code. But I wish it could go even
All that said, I am not going to fight this battle. :)
> Having mutiple signatures in BPL
> is an implementation detail, so probably __signature__ can make it into
> pydoc with more ease.
That would be nice. I am just worried because the Python folks tend to be
really rough, at least compared to the folks I tend to meet in my home
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the Cplusplus-sig