[C++-sig] call policies

[Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve]

--- Ricardo Kirkner <ricardokirkner at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you, this worked... however, pyste is still complaining about my
> method (the one that returned a double*) returns a pointer, and has no
> policy defined -- although this method now uses a wrapper which does
> not return a pointer but a tuple...
> 
> On the other hand, I have read that the operator << should be replaced
> by the str function. However,
> 
> 1. pyste isn't doing it.. (might be a thing with pyste)

Sorry, I never used Pyste. I hope someone else can help.

> 2. when I replace that operator with .def( str( self ) ), compilation fails
> with

IIRC some compilers have issues with the name lookup. You could try

  .def(self_ns::str(self))

I believe.



		
__________________________________ 
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs