[C++-sig] Excluding overloads using Pyste

[Scott McKay]

Would you be able to achieve what you want (albeit in a more labour
intensive way) by excluding something first, then adding wrappers for the
pieces you really want to expose?

Or maybe you could create a new header file with a dummy class that inherits
from the class you want to expose, and makes the methods you don't wish to
expose private, and adds stubs for non-virtual methods you wish to expose.
You could use that with pyste (and you could possibly use pyste's Rename
facility to give it the original class name in python) instead of the
original.

S

On 10/18/05, david at david.gordon.name <david at david.gordon.name> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm sure this has come up here before but I wasn't able to find a solution
> in earlier posts. It's a very simple question:
>
> Using Pyste, I understand I can exclude methods using the exclude command.
> Is it possible for me to exclude individual overloaded methods? I think a
> syntax was suggested:
>
> exclude(Class.Method[2])
>
> This would suffice, although something more robust that doesn't rely on
> method order would be better.
>
> Also, I need to exclude individual constructor and operator overloads, not
> just named methods.
>
> thanks,
>
> David
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> C++-sig mailing list
> C++-sig at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/c++-sig
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/cplusplus-sig/attachments/20051019/d013d596/attachment.htm>