[C++-sig] Newcomer - constructors not working as I'd expect
Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
rwgk at yahoo.com
Tue Apr 11 01:54:19 CEST 2006
--- Andrew Pontzen <app26 at ast.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> I agree it's not ideal. However, in the case of my current project, I
> don't really see a way of avoiding keeping hold of the reference.
> Of course in the real code, I'll be using a policy! (Is there any
> particular reason why using boost::shared_ptr would be preferable to using
> a policy?
I find using shared_ptr easier than figuring out which one is the right call
> I'd rather avoid adding support for shared_ptr through my
> existing code if possible, but am unsure if it might have any advantages.)
With shared_ptr your C++ code is also safe, not just the Python interface.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the Cplusplus-sig