[C++-sig] pyplusplus tutorials & GUI wizard
s_sourceforge at nedprod.com
Thu Feb 9 18:30:34 CET 2006
On 9 Feb 2006 at 17:39, Matthias Baas wrote:
> But the argument names are correct in my original code and do appear in
> the generated bindings...? Do you know under what circumstances gccxml
> drops the argument names?
This problem has been fixed in CVS gccxml - however, using that means
the assumptions of breakages in v0.6 are no longer valid - hence
pygccxml would need altering.
More information about the Cplusplus-sig