[C++-sig] pyplusplus tutorials & GUI wizard

Niall Douglas s_sourceforge at nedprod.com
Thu Feb 9 18:30:34 CET 2006

On 9 Feb 2006 at 17:39, Matthias Baas wrote:

> But the argument names are correct in my original code and do appear in 
> the generated bindings...? Do you know under what circumstances gccxml 
> drops the argument names?

This problem has been fixed in CVS gccxml - however, using that means 
the assumptions of breakages in v0.6 are no longer valid - hence 
pygccxml would need altering.


More information about the Cplusplus-sig mailing list