[C++-sig] Patches and complete pyste replacement prototype for pyplusplus
roman.yakovenko at gmail.com
Sat Feb 25 17:32:12 CET 2006
On 2/25/06, Allen Bierbaum <abierbaum at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/25/06, Roman Yakovenko <roman.yakovenko at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Allen and Matthias many thanks to you for your work. Meanwhile I have been
> > working on my own version. I still a little bit busy, I will review
> > every version and I promise to
> > take the best parts from all 3 proposals. It will take some time.
> Would you and Matthias be interested in collaborating on the review
> and "taking the best parts" from the 3 proprosals? For example I
> could volunteer the wiki that I have been using a a place to
> collaborate on a unified API description.
Definitly. I think, that the main test should be usability. Can you setup some
C++ project? After this everyone will create Python bindings with his
Thus, we will be able to compare and critic every API.
> I read through Matthias's reply to my posting and have gotten a much
> better understanding of where our efforts differ. I like many of
> Matthias's ideas and I would like to integrate some of them into the
> API I have been using for my bindings. There are a few things I have
> questions about, but that is exactly what the collaboration could help
> to iron out.
> Let me know if you are interested.
> On a related topic: Roman, what did you think of the patches to
> pygccxml/pyplusplus? If we were able to work through getting some of
> those things accepted I think it would enable many variations on the
> public API since they could all use the same features on the backend
> to interface with pyplusplus.
Yes. There is only one condition: pygccxml is standalone project that
is useful on
its own. I will review patches to GCC-XML and will try to apply them.
Thank you very much.
C++ Python language binding
More information about the Cplusplus-sig