[C++-sig] Overloading & keyword args bug?
dave at boost-consulting.com
Mon Jun 12 20:48:45 CEST 2006
Alex Mohr <amohr at pixar.com> writes:
>> Broken compiler code generation? The enclosed works for me without
>> errors. Got a stack backtrace?
> Interesting. Thanks for looking at it, David.
> The stack from gdb is bogus (2 empty frames). This is with gcc 4.0.1 on
> linux. I'll try with 4.0.1 on OSX and see if it's any different.
> We're supposed to upgrade to 4.0.3 this week, I think. I'll try that
> when I can.
> Anyone else out there with who's willing to try this? I'm particularly
> interested to confirm/deny with another gcc 4.0.x user.
Works for me with g++-4.0.2/4.0.0 on Cygwin also (with the boost CVS HEAD).
More information about the Cplusplus-sig