[C++-sig] Policies...

Piotr Jaroszynski p.jaroszynski at gmail.com
Sun Apr 22 22:50:53 CEST 2007


On Sunday 22 of April 2007 22:37:37 Roman Yakovenko wrote:
> The default one. In this case you don't specify the call policy for the
> function.
Thanks!

I have another two cases tho :]
1) Would there be any difference if a raw pointer instead of shared_ptr was 
used for Blah?
2) What is the proper policy if the Blah object has a reference to Foo, so 
blah = Foo().get_blah() will result in dangling reference in blah as the 
object Foo will be destroyed after the function call?

-- 
Best Regards,
Piotr Jaroszynski



More information about the Cplusplus-sig mailing list