[C++-sig] Better introspection/apidoc extraction support?
Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
rwgk at yahoo.com
Mon May 14 17:59:00 CEST 2007
I did the implementation of the "docstring_options" feature. I'm not aware of plans to work on this, but I'm interested to at least learn what could be done to better support epydoc. If it is not too time-consuming I'd be willing to work on it a bit.
> The epydoc developers would like to support boost::python function
> introspection. In boost 1.34.0, there is support for C++ signatures appended
> to the docstrings, but it would be better AFAICS if boost::python would
> additionally provide means for extracting the argument names and default
> values via ("half-private") attributes, similar to CPython.
How exactly does this work? Are there web pages about this?
Thanks!
Ralf
____________________________________________________________________________________Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/cplusplus-sig/attachments/20070514/feff1926/attachment.htm>
More information about the Cplusplus-sig
mailing list