[C++-sig] Some thoughts on py3k support

[Stefan Seefeld]

Haoyu Bai wrote:
>
> This naming style is a bit more clear but broken user's build scripts
> - not a big problem though. But when all the Python community evolved
> to py3k, and 2.x come into history, should we change the name back
> from libboost_python_py3.so to libboost_python.so?
>   

Can we postpone this question for another ten or so years ? :-)

Regards,
       Stefan

-- 

      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...