[C++-sig] function types as user-defined converters
troy d. straszheim
troy at resophonic.com
Wed Jan 6 16:10:54 CET 2010
Ravi wrote:
> On Friday 06 November 2009 14:52:49 troy d. straszheim wrote:
>> Currently, the converter type still leaks out to python in the signature:
>>
>> class S(Boost.Python.instance)
>> | add(...)
>> | add( (S)arg1, (object)arg2) -> None :
>> |
>> | C++ signature :
>> | void add(S*,to_optional<int>
>> (*)(boost::python::api::object))
>>
>>
>> converters won't nest:
>>
>> def("foo", as<returnvalue(arg1, conv1(conv2(arg2)))>(&somefn)); // nah
>>
>> I dont have a mechanism for hooking a user defined converter into the
>> return type. I'm going to have to think about that one a bit more.
>
> Did you have any ideas on this, Troy? This is the last bit I think I'd need in
> order to replace my code with yours.
>
Hi Ravi,
I haven't looked, I got pulled away. I hope to be back to this soon though.
-t
More information about the Cplusplus-sig
mailing list