[C++-sig] wrapped std::vector slice affecting items in a python list

Jim Bosch talljimbo at gmail.com
Fri Aug 12 21:30:58 CEST 2011


On 08/12/2011 04:28 AM, babak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've come across some unusual behaviour that I was hoping some one might be
> able to explain to me.
>
> In python I have a list and a wrapped std::vector<MyCustomType>  (using the
> vector_indexing_suite) where the list contains the items in the vector. If I
> slice insert items into the vector then the items in the python list change.
> The attached example illustrates this.
>
> Is this behaviour expected ?
>
> I'm quite confused as to what's going on so any help clarifying this would
> be greatly appreciated.
> thanks,
> Babak
>
> http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/file/n3738972/test.py test.py
> http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/file/n3738972/source.cpp source.cpp
>

Some of the stuff vector_indexing_suite is sufficiently complex that at 
least I'd say this behavior is not unexpected.  After all, when you 
slice a Python list, and modify the elements in the sliced bit, you 
modify the original list as well (unless your elements are immutable 
things like strings or numbers, and in that case you aren't really 
modifying them, you're replacing them).

I think the thing you get back from slicing a std::vector is probably a 
proxy object designed to have exactly that behavior (note: I haven't 
checked; that's just how I'd have implemented it).

In any case, I'd recommend against wrapping a std::vector of a mutable 
C++ type directly in Python.  It's almost always unsafe, because any 
operation on the vector that invalidates iterators will destroy the 
elements of the vector, even if there are Python objects that point to 
those elements elsewhere with nonzero reference counts.  It's much safer 
to use a vector of shared_ptr, or always convert to Python lists and 
avoid vector_indexing_suite.  This isn't a Boost.Python-specific 
problem, it's an inherent incompatibility between C++'s value-based 
containers and Python's shared-reference ones.

Jim Bosch



More information about the Cplusplus-sig mailing list