[Cryptography-dev] Verifying our History by Signing Commits

Donald Stufft donald at stufft.io
Fri Aug 9 13:00:53 CEST 2013


On Aug 9, 2013, at 6:59 AM, Laurens Van Houtven <_ at lvh.io> wrote:

> Anyway, signing merge commits is cool, the reviewer is responsible for that, although I guess that means no more magical pull-review-merge-button?

Yes this would mean no more merge button, we'd have to manually merge again. 

-----------------
Donald Stufft
PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/cryptography-dev/attachments/20130809/e6259852/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/cryptography-dev/attachments/20130809/e6259852/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Cryptography-dev mailing list