[Cryptography-dev] Interfaces for CRL handling

[Erik Trauschke]

Hi Paul,

Ok, I'll wait until this goes back. Meanwhile there are a few other
interfaces I need and I'll work on them. I'll also have a look at how
to create my own branch in github.

Erik

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Paul Kehrer <paul.l.kehrer at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> Thank you for your contribution! Some of your work overlaps with the
> interfaces we're currently building
> (https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/pull/1906/), but there is
> implementation work and other interfaces that will be very useful.
> Incidentally, your approach to fullname/relativename is one of the
> discussions underway on that PR right now.
>
> The normal way we do contribution and code review is via pull requests on
> GitHub. You can put your initial work up for discussion by doing the
> following:
>
> * Fork the project to your own account on github and check it out
> * Branch, commit, and push the branch to your own repository
> * Open a pull request against pyca/cryptography by following these
> instructions (https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-pull-request/)
>
> We're also available on freenode in #cryptography-dev to chat any time.
>
> I personally would say this work should probably wait on merging #1906, at
> which point we can pull in the CRLDistributionPoints OpenSSL implementation,
> then follow that up with a PR for the CRL object, and finally the OpenSSL
> implementation of a parser to build the CRL object.
>
> -Paul
>
>
> On May 7, 2015 at 12:01:15 PM, Erik Trauschke (erik.trauschke at gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> For my project I need cryptography to support basic handling of CRLs,
> revoked certificates and CRLDistributionPoints.
>
> I attached a patch which adds these interfaces, including test cases
> for it. I have never provided patches to a github project so I'm not
> sure how the process works.
> Do you have a separate place for code reviews (I haven't seen code
> review discussions on this list)?
>
> I would appreciate if someone could look at my changes and put them
> back to the gate, but let me know if I need to approach this
> differently.
>
> Thanks
> Erik
> ________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Cryptography-dev mailing list
> Cryptography-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cryptography-dev mailing list
> Cryptography-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev
>