[Cython] Utility Codes and templates

Stefan Behnel stefan_ml at behnel.de
Fri Jul 22 16:49:57 CEST 2011

mark florisson, 22.07.2011 16:13:
> On 22 July 2011 16:08, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Stefan Behnel, 22.07.2011 15:54:
>>> However, given that you always need to express metadata in some way (e.g.
>>> for dependencies), I don't think you can do better than with two levels
>>> anyway, so a third won't hurt *that* much.
>> Actually, I take that back. Two levels are easy (think of Windows-INI style
>> files), three levels start to get tricky.
> Fortunate that it is two levels then.

BTW, what about actually using an ini style file format? Something like the 
following may work, but I guess RawConfigParser won't be able to properly 
pass through the C code...





static void ...(); /*proto*/

static int ...(); /*proto*/

static int ...() {

static void ...() {

More information about the cython-devel mailing list