[Cython] Git workflow, branches, pull requests

Robert Bradshaw robertwb at math.washington.edu
Thu May 5 23:07:50 CEST 2011


I don't like the default to be "don't pull from me"--I'd rather there
be some convention to indicate a branch is being used as a queue.
Maybe even foo-queue, or a leading underscore if people like that.

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
<d.s.seljebotn at astro.uio.no> wrote:
> Yes, that is the only time it happens.
>
> Do we agree on a) ask before you pull anything that is not in cython/* (ie
> in private repos), b) document it in hackerguide?
>
> DS
>
>
> --
> Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>
> Robert Bradshaw <robertwb at math.washington.edu> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml at behnel.de> wrote:
>> > Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 05.05.2011 21:52: >> >> There was just a messup in
>> git history: Mark's OpenMP pull request got >> merged twice; all commits
>> show up two times. > > What (I think) happened, was that Vitja pulled in
>> Mark's changes into his > unreachable code removal branch, and they ended up
>> in his pull request. I > guess I was assuming that git wouldn't care too
>> much about branch > duplication, so I just accepted the pull request via the
>> web interface. > Apparently, it did care. > > I tend to rebase my local
>> change sets before pushing them, and I think it > makes sense to continue
>> doing that. +1, I think for as-yet-unpublished changes, it makes the most
>> sense to rebase, but for a longer-term branch, merging isn't as disruptive
>> to the history (in fact is probably more reflective of what's going on) and
>> is much better than duplication. To clarify, is this only a problem when we
>> have A cloned from master B cloned from A (or from master and then pulls in
>> A) A rebases A+B merged into master ? If this is the case, then we could
>> simply make the rule that you should ask before hacking a clone atop
>> anything but master. (Multiple people can share a repeatedly-rebased branch,
>> right.) We could also us the underscore (or another) convention to mean
>> "this branch is being used as a queue, puller beware." Surely other projects
>> have dealt with this. - Robert
>> ________________________________
>> cython-devel mailing list cython-devel at python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> cython-devel mailing list
> cython-devel at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
>
>


More information about the cython-devel mailing list