[Cython] Control Flow

[Vitja Makarov]

2011/5/28 Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml at behnel.de>:
> Vitja Makarov, 28.05.2011 13:48:
>>
>> 2011/5/28 Stefan Behnel<stefan_ml at behnel.de>:
>>>
>>> Vitja Makarov, 28.05.2011 11:48:
>>>>
>>>> 2011/5/28 Robert Bradshaw:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've recently fixed some issues:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  - closure variables were not tracked
>>>>>>  - scoped expression variables were initialized to None
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, I should fix broken tests, here are some of them:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> nogil (should be fixed)
>>>>>> purecdef (upstream)
>>>>>> cfunc_directive_in_pyclass (upstream)
>>>>>> bufaccess_noassignT444 (should be removed?)
>>>>>> bufaccess (should be fixed)
>>>>>> ass2longlong (should be fixed)
>>>>>> builtinfuncs (should be fixed)
>>>>>> extcmethcall (should be fixed)
>>>>>> extcoerce (fixed or removed?)
>>>>>
>>>>> Unless you see this code being exercised elsewhere (a run test would
>>>>> be better her anyways) it's an easy fix that should be done.
>>>>>
>>>>>> e_extweakref (should be fixed)
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've fixed all the tests.
>>>
>>> Cool.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Now I see this strange error in py2.4:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/view/cython-vitek/job/cython-vitek-tests-py24-c/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/(root)/CythonCompileTestCase/compiling__c__w_uninitialized_py3/
>>>>
>>>> *****************
>>>> compiling (c) w_uninitialized_py3
>>>> === Expected errors: ===
>>>> 7:11: local variable 'i' referenced before assignment
>>>> 13:11: local variable 'i' referenced before assignment
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> === Got errors: ===
>>>> 7:9: undeclared name not builtin: print
>>>> 7:11: local variable 'i' referenced before assignment
>>>> 13:11: local variable 'i' referenced before assignment
>>>
>>> I guess that's
>>>
>>> http://trac.cython.org/cython_trac/ticket/69
>>>
>>> In short, print() still isn't supported before Py2.6. I'd just disable
>>> that
>>> test in older Python versions for now.
>>>
>>
>> I've replaced print() with dummy ref(obj) function
>
> Ok, I think we're done then, right? Anything else to do before merging it
> back?
>

I hope so ;)


-- 
vitja.