[Cython] nested prange

[mark florisson]

Ok, great. Indeed, there is a bug in gcc 4.5, which is fixed I believe
in 4.6. For the OpenMP  backend that's not such a big issue, as it's
likely not very useful anyway.

On 26 November 2011 18:35, Robert Bradshaw <robertwb at math.washington.edu> wrote:
> I'm all for allowing it at the Cython level even though we can't emit
> code for it at the C level (due to C compiler bugs, right?)
>
> - Robert
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:12 AM, mark florisson
> <markflorisson88 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think we should allow nested prange()s, although it won't invoke
>> nested OpenMP parallelism now, it still specifies that iterations are
>> independent which can be useful for optimizations now (e.g. collapsing
>> two loops into one) and in the future with other backends. Any
>> thoughts or objections?
>> _______________________________________________
>> cython-devel mailing list
>> cython-devel at python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cython-devel mailing list
> cython-devel at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
>