[Cython] 0.16 release

[Vitja Makarov]

2012/2/15 mark florisson <markflorisson88 at gmail.com>:
> On 15 February 2012 15:45, mark florisson <markflorisson88 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 14 February 2012 21:33, Robert Bradshaw <robertwb at math.washington.edu> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:09 PM, mark florisson
>>> <markflorisson88 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 14 February 2012 17:19, Robert Bradshaw <robertwb at math.washington.edu> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:49 AM, mark florisson
>>>>> <markflorisson88 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 14 February 2012 07:07, Robert Bradshaw <robertwb at math.washington.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Vitja Makarov <vitja.makarov at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 2012/2/12 Vitja Makarov <vitja.makarov at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>> 2012/2/11 Robert Bradshaw <robertwb at math.washington.edu>:
>>>>>>>>>> All of Sage passes except for one test:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> sage -t  devel/sage/sage/misc/sageinspect.py
>>>>>>>>>> **********************************************************************
>>>>>>>>>> File "/levi/scratch/robertwb/hudson/sage-4.8/devel/sage-main/sage/misc/sageinspect.py",
>>>>>>>>>> line 970:
>>>>>>>>>>    sage: sage_getargspec(bernstein_polynomial_factory_ratlist.coeffs_bitsize)
>>>>>>>>>> Expected:
>>>>>>>>>>    ArgSpec(args=['self'], varargs=None, keywords=None, defaults=None)
>>>>>>>>>> Got:
>>>>>>>>>>    ArgSpec(args=['self'], varargs=None, keywords=None, defaults=())
>>>>>>>>>> **********************************************************************
>>>>>>>>>> File "/levi/scratch/robertwb/hudson/sage-4.8/devel/sage-main/sage/misc/sageinspect.py",
>>>>>>>>>> line 973:
>>>>>>>>>>    sage: sage_getargspec(BooleanMonomialMonoid.gen)
>>>>>>>>>> Expected:
>>>>>>>>>>    ArgSpec(args=['self', 'i'], varargs=None, keywords=None, defaults=(0,))
>>>>>>>>>> Got:
>>>>>>>>>>    ArgSpec(args=['self', 'i'], varargs=None, keywords=None, defaults=())
>>>>>>>>>> **********************************************************************
>>>>>>>>>> 1 items had failures:
>>>>>>>>>>   2 of  31 in __main__.example_21
>>>>>>>>>> ***Test Failed*** 2 failures.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Any ideas why this would have changed?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> CyFunction now provides its own code object. So inspect.getargs() is
>>>>>>>>> called instead of
>>>>>>>>> inspect.ArgSpec(*_sage_getargspec_cython(sage_getsource(obj))). It
>>>>>>>>> seems like func.func_defaults should be implemented.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've created a pull request:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/88
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks! The only other thing I can think of was a question of using
>>>>>>> caching to mitigate the longer compile times, but I can't remember if
>>>>>>> this was resolved.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The compiler has like 2 or 3 seconds of constant overhead if you use
>>>>>> memoryviews.
>>>>>
>>>>> That'd be nice to cut down, but certainly not a blocker.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> As I'm going to be MIA any day now, someone else should take up the
>>>>>>> banner to push this long awaited release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Missing in action"? Are you planning to desert? :) I can't find any
>>>>>> relevant abbreviation, but I think I know what it means,
>>>>>> congratulations in advance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Twin boys coming any day now!
>>>>
>>>> And the Cython team just keeps on growing!
>>>
>>> :)
>>>
>>>>>> Stefan, you have been involved the longest, would you feel up to the
>>>>>> task? You probably have the best understanding and experience with any
>>>>>> issues (no pressure :). Otherwise I could have a try...
>>>>>
>>>>> It's pretty easy. Once the defaults change is in it's probably worth
>>>>> cutting a beta or release candidate to email to dev/users, and if
>>>>> there's no blocking feedback you go ahead and push it out (basically
>>>>> writing up the release notes on the wiki, cleaning up trac, tagging
>>>>> the repository, making sure everything we care about on hudson is
>>>>> still passing, uploading to pypi and the website (the sdist tarball),
>>>>> emailing our lists and python-announce, re-building and updating the
>>>>> pointer to the documentation, ...) If it goes on for a while it's
>>>>> worth making/using a release branch on github.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the summary, I'm sure I would have missed one or two :) Ok,
>>>> I'll volunteer then. Maybe I can create a beta somewhere next week and
>>>> then we can see the community tear it apart.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> - Robert
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cython-devel mailing list
>>> cython-devel at python.org
>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
>>
>> Sorry, my previous email with attachment bounced. Here goes.
>>
>> I'm getting a substantial amount of failing tests on MSVC,
>> https://gist.github.com/1836766. I think most complex number tests are
>> failing because they cast
>> a struct of a certain type to itself like ((struct_A) my_struct_A),
>> which MSVC doesn't allow.
>>
>> Some tests seem to fail because they can't be imported: "compiling (c)
>> and running numpy_parallel: ImportError: No module named
>> numpy_parallel".
>>
>> And then there is a huge number of permission errors: WindowsError:
>> [Error 5] Access is denied:
>> 'c:\\Users\\mark\\cython\\BUILD\\compile\\cpp\\libc_math.pyd' . Maybe
>> something is broken in the test runner (or in my setup somehow)?
>
> The pasted output is a little munged because it was redirected to a
> log (and stdout is probably block buffering, something we could also
> fix to line buffering).

I've merged cydefaults branch and now sage-tests is blue.

-- 
vitja.