[Cython] 0.17

[mark florisson]

Hey Matthew,

Seriously, no problem, we're still getting stuff in there, no need to
hurry. If you're in Cuba it sounds like you have better stuff to do
than improve Cython's documentation :) Not to discourage contributors,
but I would really enjoy Cuba here :). I'm working on my gsoc now, so
making some time free for me is no problem here.

So I propose I just clean up my mess, post back a link to the
documentation, and then anyone who is interested can comment on
improvements.

Mark

On 23 May 2012 20:49, Matthew Brett <matthew.brett at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For the promised memoryview doc edits:
>
> Sorry - I'm in Cuba - not much internet.  I will push something for
> review by Friday, but please go ahead without me if that's not fast
> enough.  Sorry to be the blocker,
>
> Best,
>
> Matthew
>
>
> On 5/23/12, mark florisson <markflorisson88 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 23 May 2012 12:31, Robert Bradshaw <robertwb at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 6:08 AM, mark florisson
>>> <markflorisson88 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 6 May 2012 15:28, mark florisson <markflorisson88 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hey,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we already have quite a bit of functionality (nearly) ready,
>>>>> after merging some pending pull requests maybe it will be a good time
>>>>> for a 0.17 release? I think it would be good to also document to what
>>>>> extent pypy support works, what works and what doesn't. Stefan, since
>>>>> you added a large majority of the features, would you want to be the
>>>>> release manager?
>>>>>
>>>>> In summary, the following pull requests should likely go in
>>>>>    - array.array support (unless further discussion prevents that)
>>>>>    - fused types runtime buffer dispatch
>>>>>    - newaxis
>>>>>    - more?
>>>>>
>>>>> The memoryview documentation should also be reworked a bit. Matthew,
>>>>> are you still willing to have a go at that? Otherwise I can clean up
>>>>> the mess first, some things are no longer true and simply outdated,
>>>>> and then have a second opinion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>> I think we have enough stuff in to go for a 0.17 release, I have a few
>>>> more fixes and a refactoring that I'll finish tonight that might be
>>>> useful to get in as well. Currently Jenkins is yellow though, as the
>>>> reduce_pickle test fails in Python 3.
>>>
>>> I pushed a fix to the pickle tests. I've got some minor cythonize
>>> optimizations I'd like to get in for
>>> Sage as well. I'll push when I confirm thy don't break anything on
>>> jenkins.
>>>
>>> - Robert
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cython-devel mailing list
>>> cython-devel at python.org
>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
>>
>> Great, thanks for fixing it! Ok, let's wait for those things, and we
>> still also need to fix the memoryview documentation, and then we're
>> good to go I think :).
>> _______________________________________________
>> cython-devel mailing list
>> cython-devel at python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cython-devel mailing list
> cython-devel at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel