[Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement

Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Mon Aug 17 05:19:55 CEST 2015

On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Alexander Belopolsky <
alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org>
> wrote:
> > How did we end up bending over this far backwards for leap seconds?
> That's why I think February 29, 1900 may be a better selling point for
> PEP-0500 than the 36 (and counting) leap seconds.

I'm surely missing a joke here. Is this just the problem with the POSIX
standard disagreeing with Pope Gregory XIII?

--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/datetime-sig/attachments/20150816/aa84cdae/attachment.html>

More information about the Datetime-SIG mailing list