[Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking
tim.peters at gmail.com
Mon Aug 31 20:57:18 CEST 2015
[Carl Meyer <carl at oddbird.net>]
> There wasn't any of that stuff (messing with constructors, or replace,
> or combine, or naive time) in what Alex and I were discussing in the
> other thread, either. Just the idea of having `utcoffset()` raise an
> error if it hit an ambiguity.
Ah, my apologies! You're absolutely right. I didn't go back to
review Alex's reply in context, and it's a general truth that - in any
mailing list - people only remember a few things about what they
themselves have written ;-)
Thanks for setting the record straight!
More information about the Datetime-SIG