[Datetime-SIG] Local time disambiguation proposal

[Alexander Belopolsky]

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Chris Barker <chris.barker at noaa.gov> wrote:
> But we need to (a) be really clear in the docs whether the flag is consulted
> any any other time. and (b) probably be really careful in the code to make
> sure the flag is set appropriately at all times.

"This member will have the value True for all instances except those
that represent the second (chronologically) moment in time in an
ambiguous case." [1]

Does this require any more clarification?  If so, can you suggest it?

[1]: https://github.com/abalkin/ltdf/blob/master/README.rst#the-first-flag