[Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking

Alexander Belopolsky alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com
Thu Sep 3 19:31:23 CEST 2015


On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Tim Peters <tim.peters at gmail.com> wrote:

> So, assuming many changes to Python itself, this is "backward
> compatible" even to the extent of leaving conversions broken forever
> for code that wants to use classic arithmetic.
>

On top of this, I think any operations that mix strict and classic
datetimes will be prohibited as well.  Effectively a new class is
proposed.  The only thing I don't understand is why would you want to call
it "datetime"?  mxDateTime will be a much better name. :-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/datetime-sig/attachments/20150903/aa3856ef/attachment.html>


More information about the Datetime-SIG mailing list