[Datetime-SIG] IANA TZ database statistics
tim.peters at gmail.com
Sat Sep 26 04:28:20 CEST 2015
>> Wondering whether this line:
>> if probe2 != result + trans:
>> could be replaced with:
>> if probe2 == result:
> Yes, it can. Thanks for the suggestion.
Good! So you have a simple, cross-platform solution now, at least for
timestamps localtime() doesn't barf on.
> The only assumption that it requires is that no fold is bigger than 24 hours.
Well, it does rely on more than just that. For example, if there's a
gap where the clock jumps from 2 to 3, followed soon after by a fold
of an hour repeating times of the form 4:MM, then the second
occurrence of 4:30 won't be detected as such.- the fold and the gap
"cancel out" with respect to subtracting 24 hours in either naive time
or timestamp time.
So it seems a sufficient condition is that there's at most one UTC
offset change in the last 24 hours.
I wouldn't be surprised if that's always true now - or that it won't
be after Kim Jong-un learns he could annoy us by making it false ;-)
More information about the Datetime-SIG