[PYTHON DB-SIG] DB-Modules returning lists

Greg Stein gstein@microsoft.com
Fri, 10 Jan 1997 14:28:46 -0800


heh... Jim Fulton and I discussed using the matrix module at one point,
along with Jim Huginin. We punted, though, because of the need to fetch
everything and wanting to reduce dependencies.

A comment: you mentioned how you typically just want to fetch
everything, regardless. The fetchall() method exists because I got that
same feedback from a number of people at the conference a while back (in
particular, Benny Shomer was particularly persuasive :-).

Most of my usage is actually fetchmany() called with a maximum number of
rows that I want.

If you could post your classes, even in their current form, then I bet
somebody will find some use for them. I once mentioned a couple years
ago: post what you have. Never wait "to clean it up" because they will
never be cleaned up to your satisfaction, so it will never get posted,
so nobody will ever be able to benefit from your contribution.  :-)

-g

>----------
>From: 	P.S.Craig@durham.ac.uk[SMTP:P.S.Craig@durham.ac.uk]
>Sent: 	Friday, January 10, 1997 1:45 AM
>To: 	db-sig@python.org
>Subject: 	Re: [PYTHON DB-SIG] DB-Modules returning lists
>
>Hi,
>
>I have been following this discussion with some interest and debating
>whether I should step in with my pennyworth. Here it is.
>
>About 4 months ago, I needed a python binding to ingres so that I
>could python/Tk to provide a GUI for some student attendance records
>which are entered by many people and which need to be accessible to
>the whole department.
>
>I decided to brew my own for a number of reasons:
>1) I was unable to get hold of the standard stuff which people have
>   been talking about because of connection problems to the ftp site.
>2) I do not come from a database background.  In fact, I am generally
>   much more interested the Matrix-SIG than the DB-SIG.
>3) I wanted to be able to do numerical computations with the results
>   of queries without having to write lots of type conversion code.
>
>The solution I settled on was to use two-dimensional Numerical python
>arrays to hold the results of select queries. I can imagine that those
>reading this will immediately say that not all data is numerical and
>of course you are right.  The secret is that Numerical python can
>handle multi-dimensional arrays of arbitrary python objects.
>
>There are several benefits: 
>
>1) The ability to perform binary operations with results of queries
>   can be nice.
>2) Often the 2-d array from a db actually represents a
>   higher-dimensional structure. It's easy with numerical python to
>   change the dimensionality of the returned array. Then we can access
>   the data in its natural representation
>3) The problem of naming the columns is easily solved by wrapping the
>   numerical python array in a class which implements __getitem__ and
>   __setitem__ to allow named columns. It's then easy to pick out data
>   which satisfy additional criteria to those specified in the
>   original query without returning to the db.
>4) Numerical python is fairly efficient.
>
>A couple of slight problems:
>
>1) Wrapping the numerical python arrays in another class means that
>   binary operations don't work transparently. In principle, this can
>   be resolved using the UserArray stuff for numerical python, but I
>   haven't yet had the time.
>2) I have dropped the whole cursor idea. All data from a query is
>   lifted immediately into python in one gulp. Potentially disastrous
>   for very large query results. Is this a big hassle in practice?
>   Not for me, at any rate.
>
>The modified numerical python stuff is implemented in a module. I sort
>of intend this module to end up offering an array interface similar to
>S (a statistics and data analysis package).
>
>I also have a class based SQL interface to ingres. The basic classes
>are Connection, View, Alias, Table and a bunch of operator classes for
>handling query building. The module works well, but I am aware that it
>needs a number of extra classes to make it cleaner (Field, Query,
>etc).
>
>I feel irritated with myself for doing everything completely from
>scratch. I don't know if any of what I have described is interesting
>to others. If it is, I'll be pleased to show you my (lousy) code or
>tell you more about how it works.
>
>Peter Craig
>
>#--------------------------------------------------------------------#
>| E-mail:   P.S.Craig@durham.ac.uk  Telephone: +44-91-3742376 (Work) |
>| Fax:      +44-91-3747388                     +44-91-3860448 (Home) |
>|                                                                    |
>| WWW:      http://fourier.dur.ac.uk:8000/stats/psc.html             |
>|							             |
>| Snail:    Peter Craig, Dept. of Math. Sciences, Univ. of Durham,   |
>|           South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, England			     |
>#--------------------------------------------------------------------#
>
>=================
>DB-SIG  - SIG on Tabular Databases in Python
>
>send messages to: db-sig@python.org
>administrivia to: db-sig-request@python.org
>=================
>

=================
DB-SIG  - SIG on Tabular Databases in Python

send messages to: db-sig@python.org
administrivia to: db-sig-request@python.org
=================