[DB-SIG] Persistent Storage of Objects
Andrew M. Kuchling
Tue, 4 Apr 2000 10:46:11 -0400 (EDT)
M.-A. Lemburg writes:
>everybody has their own specific needs. The range of applications
>is huge: from simple dictionary like interfaces to tables to
>complete nested object hierarchies with auto-load and -store,
>version control and all the goodies in that bag. Plus maybe
>meta-information control to build search engines on top of the
True, but maybe a useful middle ground could be implemented. Maybe
something like Tangram (http://www.tangram-persistence.org/) -- you'd
have a simple schema language for laying out classes, their
attributes, and the relations between them, and then have code to
store objects in a set of DB tables.
>I'd rather like to see a DB API compatible JDBC interface...
Is there anything about that problem that needs discussion, though, or
is it a simple matter of programming?
A.M. Kuchling http://starship.python.net/crew/amk/
Q. What does Kibo think of television?
A. TV is evil and must be destroyed. A good way to do this is to watch your
set until it burns out.
-- The alt.religion.kibology FAQ