[DB-SIG] Persistent Storage of Objects
Tue, 4 Apr 2000 11:27:32 -0400
Andrew M. Kuchling [firstname.lastname@example.org] wrote:
> M.-A. Lemburg writes:
> >everybody has their own specific needs. The range of applications
> >is huge: from simple dictionary like interfaces to tables to
> >complete nested object hierarchies with auto-load and -store,
> >version control and all the goodies in that bag. Plus maybe
> >meta-information control to build search engines on top of the
> >stored objects.
> True, but maybe a useful middle ground could be implemented. Maybe
> something like Tangram (http://www.tangram-persistence.org/) -- you'd
> have a simple schema language for laying out classes, their
> attributes, and the relations between them, and then have code to
> store objects in a set of DB tables.
If you *really* want to do this with the right architecture, I would
recommend you steep yourself in Enterprise Objects Framework (from
Apple, formerly NeXT). This is *way* ahead of anyone else's
implementation and is based on a lot of graph theory and faulting.
For more information, you should read:
This has information on all of the frameworks. I've started working
on providing a UML model of them, but it's pretty extensive.
| Christopher Petrilli