[DB-SIG] Some obscurity with paramstyle

Michael Bayer mike_mp at zzzcomputing.com
Sun Jul 17 16:54:07 CEST 2011

On Jul 17, 2011, at 1:52 AM, Vernon Cole wrote:

> 2) some major applications (e.g. django) assume %s format.
> But I am +1 for the idea anyway.

But not all DBAPIs support %s format, do you mean that Django assumes %s format for those DBAPIs that are known to do so ?   Shouldn't they be at least using .paramstyle to determine that ?

Is there a path to changes being made in the DBAPI?   i.e. would there be a DBAPI 3 ?  

More information about the DB-SIG mailing list