[DB-SIG] Some obscurity with paramstyle
mike_mp at zzzcomputing.com
Sun Jul 17 16:54:07 CEST 2011
On Jul 17, 2011, at 1:52 AM, Vernon Cole wrote:
> 2) some major applications (e.g. django) assume %s format.
> But I am +1 for the idea anyway.
But not all DBAPIs support %s format, do you mean that Django assumes %s format for those DBAPIs that are known to do so ? Shouldn't they be at least using .paramstyle to determine that ?
Is there a path to changes being made in the DBAPI? i.e. would there be a DBAPI 3 ?
More information about the DB-SIG