[DB-SIG] conn.close() idempotence

James William Pye lists at jwp.name
Sun Nov 20 22:27:07 CET 2011

On Oct 18, 2011, at 10:36 PM, Michael Bayer wrote:
> I'm +1 for close() on a closed connection being harmless.  rollback() already has this behavior, as the spec specifies "rolls back the start of any pending transaction", thus allowing for no activity if no transaction is present.

yep.. +1

cheers, jwp

More information about the DB-SIG mailing list